Do you know about the book,, Not Quite What I was Planning: Six Word Memoirs from Writers Famous and Obscure? (My co-host Marrie Stone, interviewed the editor on the show a few weeks back.)

Well, they’re looking for submissions for a new collection due out on Valentine’s Day. Here’s the link if you’d like to submit your six-word memoir.

Here’s a photo from our evening at the Newport Beach Public Library. Lauren Weisberger, seated beside me, came to talk about her new book, Chasing Harry Winston, and of course we talked about her first book, The Devil Wears Prada.

I met Lauren in the conference room with her media escort and her husband Mike. She wasn’t wearing Prada, not that I thought she would be, but somehow I thought if you wrote a book about something that happened to you while you worked at the biggest fashion magazine, that you would be into fashion.

So I spent more time than I should have concerned with what to wear. Should I wear my best white pantsuit that I bought at Nordstrom last year? I almost emailed Lauren to ask what she was going to wear, so we would sort of match, but didn’t. I decided to dress the way I always dress for literary events, which is how I usually dress in general, only not as casual (no tee-shirts, no pull over cotton jerseys, no black workout pants, no faded jeans). I did bring along my knock-off Prada bag. It was meant to be a joke, but I don’t think Lauren found it funny. (Later I decided she was burnt out on Prada jokes and people thinking she was into Prada.) I bought it a few years ago at a flea market in Pennsylvania because I loved the lime green color and size. The Prada logo put me off, though.

I don’t want to buy a knock-off, I told my cousin John.

So Sharpie in the logo, he said.

That’s tacky, I said, buying the bag but leaving the Prada logo alone. When I carry it, I turn the logo side toward my leg so the logo doesn’t show.

I was happily surprised Lauren was dressed casually in white jeans and sandals. She likes to buy jeans, perhaps more than she should (says she). Her diamond wedding band caught the light as big diamonds will. I loved the ring.

In the conference room she said she thought we should only talk a little and use the time for questions. She said she hated the media. I commiserated. So many radio and TV people are only interested in sound bites, I said. I told her I thought we’d talk for 30 minutes or so and then take questions. She thought that was too long. I said it would be okay. She said she liked questions. I said it would be fine. I worried, though, that she seemed nervous.

But it was fine. It was actually great fun. Lauren seemed to genuinely have a great time, too.

Before an audience of 230, Lauren and I talked about her books, but we also talked a great deal about writing. One tidbit I took away (that a lot of us took away) is that Lauren is distracted just like the rest of us, with email. Even a speck of dust can seem fascinating. And yet the girl is extremely productive. I found that inspiring, that she’s distracted often and is so productive anyway.

In the photo, you’ll see Lauren and me seated, and behind us are Lauren’s new husband Mike, NBPL Executive Director Tracy Keys, and Event Coordinator Janis Dinwiddie, with Dinwiddie Events. Kudos to Tracy and Janis–the library has been bringing in solid authors and helping to quench the Orange County thirst for literary events. Yay, Tracy and Janis!

If you’re on my e-list for the radio show, you’ve received this. If not….

Tomorrow, Weds. June 11, for the entire hour, we’ll have three authors–Naomi Hirahara, Gary Phillips, and Susan Straight–talking about noir. I’m excited!

Naomi is the author of the Mas Arai mystery novels and the noir short story: “Number 19.” Gary is the author of the Ivan Monk and Martha Chainey series, and a lot of short stories including the noir story “Roger Crumbler Considered His Shave.” Susan is a novelist (“Highwire Moon” was a National Book Award nominee), and the noir short story: “The Golden Gopher,” which won an Edgar. All three of the stories highlighted above are in the collection: “los angeles noir,” published by Akashic Books.

Tune in at 9 a.m. Pacific at 88.9 FM KUCI or listen on iTunes. Eventually the show will be podcast and you can find it (and many other podcasts) here.

My student Sarah shared this article with me. A good list!

When I’m skimming through the New Yorker or Tin House or any number of other journals with formidable-to-crazy good short fiction, I maybe read the first line and if it doesn’t grab me, I go on to the next. Life’s too short for a short story–or essay or novel–that doesn’t sing.

This morning I roamed the New Yorker web site looking for a short story for my Gotham class and I found this one by Alice Munro. I could not stop reading.

She knocked my socks off with “A Bear Comes Over the Moutain,” that was made into the movie, Away From Her. Incredible artistry. But I don’t want to influence you. Read it. Tell me what you think.

A couple of Pen on Fire blog readers have questions about point of view.

Bibliophile says:

Hi B, I’ve been writing different parts of the same story in many different points of view. I’ve got at least 5 main characters, all speaking in first person. I then spent a week revising everything to omniscient… spent another week reading every chapter on POV in my collection of writing aid books. I had an idea to make one character in to the ‘listener,’ the one collecting all these stories from the other characters, but thought that might seem amateur-ish. Any advice?

And Christina says:

I finished reading a novel by one of my favorite authors. This particular novel has three main characters. For two, she uses first person; but for the other character, she uses third. It didn’t confuse me as a reader, but as an aspiring writer; I feel like I need to know why this was done. I couldn’t find the significance of using a different POV for this character – besides the point that the character was dealing with a lot of pain and in the end, she ended up killing her mother.

What do you think about using different POV’s in your novel? Is there some type of rule out there that this author broke? As I said, this character was fighting through a LOT. Do you think the author switched the POV on her readers because it was easier to tell the story from a third person POV; rather than take us through the characters inner toil from her POV? Or perhaps when dealing with customer going through a lot mentally, it is better to use a third person POV?

I’m not trying to attack the writer; there’s so much I need to learn about writing fiction – so when I see something I’ve never seen before, I just have to ask!

Well … that’s a lot to chew on.

I’ll just give my thoughts and if others reading this blog have thoughts/opinions, please feel free to let them fly. I’m not the last word on this subject.

I don’t think there are any fast rules on point of view. As soon as an author or writing teacher says, “This is the way!” someone comes along to break it. In my humble opinion, you do what works for the story you’re writing.

I do think when you’re writing a short story, using more than one point of view can get to be too much. It’s so such a short form!

But with novels, like so very much in life and writing, it just depends. If you use more then one point of view, you’ve got to have a reason. Often the reason writers do this is that they wanted to get at various aspects of story and they just couldn’t do that using one point of view character.

Usually you wait to change point of view characters with a new chapter. Although Ann Patchett did not do this in Bel Canto and it worked quite wonderfully. In Atonement, the novel is written in the third person until you get to the end, and then it goes into first person. Worked for me!

If you’re writing a first novel, it probably makes sense to stick with one point of view, because you’re getting to know the form, and why complicate things for yourself?

These are just my initial thoughts. I’ll keep pondering. Meanwhile, if anyone has anything to add, please do!