Take a look. I love the illustration. Here you go.

Talk about detail!  Writer Chelsey Drysdale noted every little thing. I love it. If you weren’t there–and even if you were, but want to recapture and remember the night–click here for Chelsey’s write-up.

Call for Submissions: William Saroyan International Prize for Writing
Entry Deadline: January 31, 2014

Nominations are now being accepted for the William Saroyan International Prize for Writing. Two prizes of $5,000 each are given biennially for works of fiction and nonfiction. Cosponsored by the Stanford University Libraries and the William Saroyan Foundation, the awards are intended to “encourage new or emerging writers and honor the Saroyan legacy of originality, vitality, and stylistic innovation.”

For more information — including entry forms, contest rules, complete guidelines, and press materials —visit the website at http://library.stanford.edu/Saroyan

Thank you for helping us spread the word!

Best regards,
(Ms.) Sam Petersen, for Stanford University Libraries
Tel: 650.854.5575; Email: sampetersen@sbcglobal.net

Journalists….

We are now accepting the applications for the 2014-15 Class of John S. Knight Journalism Fellows at Stanford University. The program brings together eight international and 12 U.S. journalists and journalism entrepreneurs who spend their year developing their ideas around challenges and opportunities for journalism innovation, entrepreneurship and leadership.

Information on how to apply can be found here http://goo.gl/2CUGsR

Please share this link with your friends, colleagues or anyone you think might be interested and a worthy candidate.

The deadline for international applications is Dec. 1, 2013; for U.S. applications, it is Jan. 15, 2014.

Find our tweets here: @JSKStanford and look for #JSKnet on Twitter for updates.

Thanks,

Robin Evans,
Outreach & Marketing Manager
John S. Knight Journalism Fellowships
Stanford University
revans1@stanford.edu
650-721-5955

Underworld by Don DeLillo
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Oh, where to begin with this book? First, let me say that I LOVED DeLillo’s White Noise and am such a fan of his writing. There are few better writers. He’s right up there at the top. But this book, oh, this book. I saw him read from it in L.A. at a Lannan Foundation lecture when the Lannan Foundation was still in L.A. I bought a hard cover then. And I started reading. I made it to page 400 and almost was crushed under its weight. But I always wanted to finish.

So I got it on Audible last spring. Love the reader. Same reader as for a bunch of Richard Ford’s books. LOVE the reader. But this time I’m not going to make it as far as page 400. I’m on the page where a character is asking another character if he knows what hospitals do with all the legs and arms they cut off of people, and that’s it. That’s it!

The book is too long. What I want to read about are Nick and Clara, and this story line is hardly in the book. I wish all the other story lines would go away and just focus on Nick and Clara. They would be enough.

I feel like DeLillo is constantly bursting with ideas and thoughts and theories and he had to pour them all into this book. He’s brilliant–of course he is, but enough already.

Once again, I will put the book aside. I love his writing and his use of metaphor and simile–we could all take a lesson here–but the story is a stew, a ratatouille, a casserole comprised of too many ingredients.

The end.

View all my reviews

    Fiction writer, poet, and UC-Irvine MFA in Fiction program director Ron Carlson was our guest the other night at the Pen on Fire Speaker Series & Salon.  One thing I remember that he said was that he wrote so many stories and books on a typewriter, which befuddle his students.  With a typewriter, he said, there’s only one way in and no way out.  With a computer, there’s one way in, and a million ways out. He had to stop himself from ranting about how the Internet and email are a writer’s main hazard. And I loved hearing him read, again, one of my favorite stories of his, and perhaps of all time, “Single Woman for Long Walks on Beach.” (A few of you have asked where to find the story. It’s in the collection, At the Jim Bridger.)  I asked a few friends in attendance what they took away from the evening and here’s what they said.

Cindy Christeson: Ron said, “You have to tolerate your story migrating from what you think it should be to what it wants to be…start from what you know, ’till you write what you don’t know…”  I also thought it was fascinating to hear him talk about the differences between the typewriter and our computers…the typewriter sat there quietly, waiting, saying, “What do you have for me: as opposed to all our computers are saying to us, and distracting us.” And the four things, in his words, that you can’t teach: Attention, Vision (world view), Subject (what you choose to write about), and Empathy.

Michael Thomas Barry, author of Literary Legends of the British Isles: A Guide to the Lives & Burial Places of 50 Great Writers (2013, Schiffer): Author Ron Carlson is a master story teller. His lively and off the cuff discussion at the recent Pen on Fire salon was quite entertaining. I found his remarks regarding the observation of everyday life to be both enlightening and informative. His stream of consciousness style of writing and speaking, as well as his homespun sense of humor was refreshing.

Travis Barrett: I liked when he said, I don’t know why I made characters writers.  Now, painters … painters have paints and canvases and easels, but writers don’t have anything.  They don’t even have paper anymore.

Marrie Stone: Last night Ron Carlson took us on a guided tour of his brain, or at least of his thinking during the writing process.  By reading excerpts of poetry, short stories and novels, he shared his thoughts on writing realistic dialogue, creating an effective setting, and managing tension in a scene.
“Always overwrite,” he advised, by listing all the contents in a character’s purse, or trunk, something will come of it later.
Carlson talks like a poet.  His attention to language, even in casual conversation, is lovely.  His details and descriptions are rich, and the worlds he spins are wonderful.  Another amazing evening with an erudite man.

Nancy Carpenter: The “inventory” he referenced:  the up-front foundation that sets the stage for the balance of the work.  Some of the small detail resonates later.  Also, he focused on attention:  something that cannot be taught, that ability to observe and engage.  Loved the reference to getting the story to a boil:  the focus required to bring a novel to a conclusion.  The required commitment.

Victoria Templeton: What I came away with was take your time, then bring [your writing] to a boil. He said to work with moments and that stick in your head. I mentioned to him I am confused because  some authors suggest to write the end first so you know where to work towards. He said work in whatever way the work comes. No need to know the end. The “come to a boil part” and “giving a piece the needed attention when its time to make it boil” stuck with me the most. I also liked his quirky humor. He’s not linear but he is prolific. I liked that he doesn’t allow his undergrads write setting in typical form. No changing of the leaves, no idyllic moon, but more concrete form of setting. I’m still processing so more will come later.

Suzanne Redfearn, Hush Little Baby (TBR Oct. 2013): Last night I attended Barbara DeMarco-Barrett’s Pen on Fire Speaker event with the wonderfully talented and funny Ron Carlson. He entertained the audience with his delightful poem, Room Service, followed by reading from his new novel Return to Oak Pine and then a romantic short story that left the sold-out room smiling. It was an evening well spent!

Anne Dunham: I like the angle he never had to write for money so he could be selective in what he chooses to on. His one requirement is that he has one project on the front burner so that it boils. He can tell the books that have been written on medium heat and he doesn’t find them worthwhile. He looks for the “density of thread per inch.”
“Each bullet hole has a thousand stories.”
On writing dialogue: He sits in all the chairs.
On his latest book, he wanted to add sentimentality ( or sentiment?) but it had to be earned and he did (this point alone piques my interest…).
One interesting take is that men talk to each other while working together on  projects (that point never occurred to me! I do know they are more comfortable sitting shoulder to shoulder like in a bar).
His hands are smarter than his head. His hands get him into the story working with inventory, writing what you know until you don’t know. Developing fresh inventory is how he survives the story.
Use fresh inventory: Give celery and Windex as a Valentine gift to your significant other. (Hmmm… wonder if he ever gave his significant other that?)
He looks for what is provocative … the “what if.”
First drafts are written to find the story’s elevation.
And for the memoirists … drumroll here: “Memory is not more reliable than imagination.” – Ask: Did that happen? The answer is no. Then ask: Is that true?  The answer is yes.  (Brilliant!)
A great evening. So many keen insights!

Toby Goode:   I only wish I could have recorded Ron last night. I took away a lot, but he offered so many gems that I’m sure I never caught even a glint of. Listening to him brought his book, Ron Carlson Writes a Story, to life for me. His book makes the art of telling a story look easy, but I learned last night the “full attention” he gives to his story to bring it to “full boil.” A lot of books are written at “medium heat” so that they are good enough. That’s not good enough for him.
He said he writes from “place” because “nothing happens nowhere” and he writes about those moments in life where things collide. Start with a moment when you’re beside yourself, add lots of inventory–you may need it later– and then follow your way into the story and get lost. “I’m big on finding. Why would I hurry when I don’t know where I’m going…. I can’t think my way across the story, but I can find my in by not hurrying, lingering. Start from what you know, believe it, then pretty soon write what you don’t know. It’s like entering the ocean and that key moment when you can’t touch, then what happens?”
Oh and what about …”Grammar is fantastic, but it doesn’t get in the room the first time. I want the savage in the room first. I respect that guy.”
Great night. Thank you!

Photography: Barbara DeMarco-Barrett